Pride and Prejudice
Camy here. Most of you know that I’m a pretty die-hard Jane Austen fan. But I had heard so many negative reviews of the Keira Knightley version of Pride and Prejudice that I put off watching it for a while.
Well, my Tivo has a Wishlist search for Pride and Prejudice and recorded it, so I figured I might as well watch it since it’s taking up memory space on my Tivo and I don’t have to waste a Netflix space on it.
My opinion: It’s not bad. But it’s not as good as the 1995 version with Colin Firth.
However, there are a few things in its favor.
Some of the non-Austen dialogue is really quite funny and witty.
The scene of Mr. Collins dancing with Lizzie is HYSTERICAL! I was hooting and laughing. The actor who played Mr. Collins, Tom Hollander, is phenomenal, but my only complaint is that he made Mr. Collins very sympathetic and likable rather than prosy and ridiculous like he is in the book.
The scene of Bingley pacing before he proposes is cute.
Mr. Darcy coming through the morning mist is very romantic. Matthew Macfadyen is a handsomer and more passionate Darcy than Colin Firth, besides being younger, but I did think he made Mr. Darcy softer and less austere than Colin Firth did. Colin’s portrayal is closer to the book, in my opinion, but Matthew is a teeny bit more pleasant to look at.
Keira Knightley is good, which didn’t surprise me since I think she’s a rather good actress, although she played Lizzie with more fire and not quite as much wit as she is portrayed in the book.
Judi Dench made Lady Catherine more elegant rather than ridiculous as she is in the book. I don’t think Judi Dench could be ridiculous if she tried, she has that magnanimous air that lends elegance to whatever she plays. Still, Lady Catherine lost that humorous edge and was more dramatic instead.
Donald Sutherland was quite good, which surprised me a little, since I couldn’t quite see him playing Mr. Bennet at first, but he pulled it off really well. My only complaint (and this might have been the script) is that in the movie, Mr. Bennet lost the humor and wit he had in the book.
I liked that the actors for various characters were as attractive as they were in the book, like Wickham and Jane Bennet.
There were some inconsistencies with Regency time periods—Lizzie’s hair being down, Caroline Bingley in a sleeveless dress, no gloves on half the people at the ball, men and women. Things like that. They kind of jarred me out of the story a bit. And what was up with Lady Catherine visiting in the middle of the night???
Overall, I liked the actors in this version better, I think, with the exception of Julia Sawalha and Alison Steadman from the 1995 version. But the script for the 1995 version and the direction is still my favorite. Was this entertaining? Yes. Would I buy the DVD for this version? No.
What did you guys think?
Camy Tang lives in San Jose, California. She previously worked in biology research, she is a staff worker for her church youth group, and she runs the Story Sensei critique service. Her humorous romance, Single Sashimi, is out now, and her romantic suspense, Deadly Intent, releases in July. She also gives away Christian fiction on her blog and her newsletter YahooGroup.





















Recent Comments